gamesradar.com Forum Index gamesradar.com
Games and stuff
 
  FAQFAQ     SearchSearch     MemberlistMemberlist     UsergroupsUsergroups  
  ProfileProfile     You have no new messagesYou have no new messages     Log out [ Rev. Stuart Campbell ]Log out [ Rev. Stuart Campbell ]  

Driv3r Reviews. Were PSM2 & XBW honest? (Part II)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 62, 63, 64  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    gamesradar.com Forum Index -> General games chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Prince Of Evil
New Member
New Member


Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 66

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aren't people taking this a bit too seriously? It's only a game after all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cal
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2004
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prince Of Evil wrote:
Aren't people taking this a bit too seriously? It's only a game after all.


Maybe, but if you're slogging your guts out doing a paper round or saturday job for the £40 to buy the game only to find... well you know where this is going.

So, it is actually serious for a lot of people for whom £40 is a lot of money to chuck away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KKLEIN
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 8444
Location: Misery Guts Avenue

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sprite Machine wrote:
No, we have a difference of opinion. What they said is totally truthful, not a lie.

Well at the very least it's 'bending' the truth to ridiculous levels.
_________________
That's a disc drive. What's been in them you ask? Well:
PS2 - Smackdown HCTP, PSM2 disc 51.
Xbox - Driv3r
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sprite Machine
Starting Member
Starting Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 8
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KKLEIN wrote:
Well at the very least it's 'bending' the truth to ridiculous levels.

Well the 'truth' doesn't really come into it, unless they were to say "the framerate maintains a constant 60 frames per second," which would be a total and utter lie.


However, I'd quite agree, whilst anyone is entitled to score it whatever they want, I'd certainly consider anyone who gave it a 9 to be a bit of a nonce. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eighthours
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Oct 2003
Posts: 6606
Location: Certainty

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sprite Machine wrote:
No, we have a difference of opinion. What they said is totally truthful, not a lie.
If they didn't mention any other 'faults' it's because they didn't think it had any others. It falls quite happily into that 'subjective trap' again, you see.
"The framerate is bad, the pop-up is bad, the on-foot controls are bad" - are these facts? Are these factual faults that have been ignored? No, they are a matter of opinion.


I think such technical aspects of a game can be seen as fact to a certain extent, to be perfectly honest.

Sprite Machine wrote:
Driver 1 had loads of pop-up, occasional slow-down, glitches, bugs (most of them were more 'funny' than anything else) and so forth, and yet that gets widely praised (and rightly so, I might add - see my Driver 'Retroview' on Gamestyle for a drive down memory lane...)!


But that was back in....when.....1999? We're a full generation of hardware and 5 years ahead of that now!! Such flaws are not acceptable anymore. As an analogy, if Star Wars Episode 3 had the same standard of visual effects as a 50s film, don't you think it would be quite alright to slate it for that reason while reviewing it?! And that the mag in question would be doing a GRAVE disservice to its readers if they didn't mention it?

Sprite Machine wrote:
It's well within anyone's rights to score Driv3r a 9 out of 10 if they want to, if they believe, in their opinion, it is worth such a score; though personally, I don't (my issues with the game stem from rather infuriating design decisions and over-harshness).


You're spot-on there, but the point of this thread is that it looks increasingly likely that the review scores (coincidentally the exclusive reviews) don't correspond with the non-exclusive scores now coming in thick and fast, for reasons not of opinion, but because of influence from the Atari PR Svengalis. I tell you what, if any of the other mags next month give it a 9 then we can safely say that it's all opinion. I almost guarantee they won't.
_________________
Humiliate John Rodney Bennett
Trash CompDeck
Confront Juliet
But do it quickly....you've only got eight hours to live
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sprite Machine
Starting Member
Starting Member


Joined: 23 Jun 2004
Posts: 8
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eighthours wrote:
I think such technical aspects of a game can be seen as fact to a certain extent, to be perfectly honest.


Well, technically, they wouldn't be fact*. They'd still be opinion, but they'd be a shared opinion unanimously agreed upon by virtually everyone on the face of the planet. Like, for example, if a game had a framerate of 3 frames per second, you could say the frame rate is "fine", but people would certainly question your mental health if you did. Wink


*It's just a matter of the subjectivity of the phrasing, really.

Eighthours wrote:
You're spot-on there, but the point of this thread is that it looks increasingly likely that the review scores (coincidentally the exclusive reviews) don't correspond with the non-exclusive scores now coming in thick and fast, for reasons not of opinion, but because of influence from the Atari PR Svengalis. I tell you what, if any of the other mags next month give it a 9 then we can safely say that it's all opinion. I almost guarantee they won't.

As do I. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OctogenarianPussy
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 649
Location: Retard Proof Clothing - Available now

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't Nellis posting his views on the game today?
_________________
I came here to chew ass and kick bubblegum. And I'm all out of ass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bomberman
Starting Member
Starting Member


Joined: 17 Jan 2004
Posts: 31
Location: Beyond good and evil

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

???\0\0\0\0???\0quote="Prince Of Evil"]Aren't people taking this a bit too seriously? It's only a game after all.[/quote]

Maybe, but if you're slogging your guts out doing a paper round or saturday job for the £40 to buy the game only to find... well you know where this is going.

So, it is actually serious for a lot of people for whom £40 is a lot of money to chuck away.[/quote]


Surely if you don't like it, you take it back. everywhere does refunds these days. problem solved!
_________________
This is from… Matilda…
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
KKLEIN
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 15 Jul 2002
Posts: 8444
Location: Misery Guts Avenue

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OctogenarianPussy wrote:
Isn't Nellis posting his views on the game today?

So he told us anyway.
_________________
That's a disc drive. What's been in them you ask? Well:
PS2 - Smackdown HCTP, PSM2 disc 51.
Xbox - Driv3r
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CyberE1ectric
Member
Member


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Just look at the piles of sh*t the movie industry manages to get hundreds of millions from


The games industry and the film industry works in completely different ways. We need to remember that.

If I heard that Troy was a pile of sh*t, which had wooden horses driving in the sky and Bradd Pitt bouncing up and down through the floor, I would still have paid £4 to watch it, and I'm sure most people would have.

I would not pay £45 quid for a game that's as bad as Driv3r is supposed to be. I wouldn't even pay £4 for it...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OctogenarianPussy
Experienced Member
Experienced Member


Joined: 19 Sep 2003
Posts: 649
Location: Retard Proof Clothing - Available now

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Owner of A Landfill Site in Newcastle wrote:

Brace for impact and howay the lads!

_________________
I came here to chew ass and kick bubblegum. And I'm all out of ass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pell
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 30 Sep 2003
Posts: 2689
Location: Modding at The Fun House

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CyberE1ectric wrote:
I would not pay £45 quid for a game that's as bad as Driv3r is supposed to be. I wouldn't even pay £4 for it...
Did you even think before you wrote that?
_________________
And now... Witness the destructive power of these armed and fully operational gaming leagues!
The Ultimate Gaming Quiz: Round 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
GwiDan
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 16 Jul 2002
Posts: 5957
Location: Hiding the corpses...

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KKLEIN wrote:
OctogenarianPussy wrote:
Isn't Nellis posting his views on the game today?

So he told us anyway.


He'd be a brave man to come back after yesterday, and the fact that their editorial team bowed to the might of commercialism instead of refusing with a bit of integrity showed they're not particularly brave at that Future office.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
tnman
Veteran Member
Veteran Member


Joined: 14 Apr 2003
Posts: 2737
Location: My spinny chair. *Spins*.

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I’d just like to take this time to analyse some of the stupider stuff posted in this thread.

OctogenarianPussy wrote:
Perhaps this game will be the one to bring this murky practice out into the spotlight?


What the f**k are you on about? You’re making it seem like all the Future staff are locked away in dark rooms, with cash regularly fed through the door accompanied by preview codes asking for a good score. There is no murky practice.

KKLEIN wrote:
Just to prove how good these ‘journalists’ are, one of them (Tim Clark – OPS2) used to work for the smutty Live TV cable channel. Don’t know what it is? Think sex, sex & yes, more sex. Oh and the odd UFO & Bangers’n’smash program too.


People DO have previous careers you know. Neutral What’s the problem?

GwiDan wrote:
Everyone knows that magazines get paid off; it's been happening for years.


Everyone? What a crock of shite.

GwiDan wrote:
Printed magazines are no longer worth the trees they're printed on - the journalists don't make enough money to have ideals, and if they're offered a nice bonus for some mild "alterations" to an unimportant-in-the-grand-scheme-of-things game, then so be it. It's human nature, and filthy rich game publishers capitalize on this.


I’m not saying things like this don’t happen, but at Future I know they don’t. For the week I spent there I didn’t see any cash-ridden envelopes which are what everyone thinks lies around desks casually. This is one review in two separate magazines, just because two people, two separate reviewers, happened to like the game all of a sudden they’re bribed?! MHTL likes Kirby Air Ride you know. He only likes it because he was bribed to publicise it here on GR. Rolling Eyes

poser1929 wrote:
I'm a qualified journalist - a 'proper' one, not at a games mag. Several times I've seen good stories pulled because of board-level decisions.


Are you short of a few brain cells?! Since when is a journalist who writes for a games magazine not ‘proper’?! Go back to school, your crayola-drawn qualifications really don’t mean anything.

KKLEIN wrote:
All their magazines promise honest articles & sensible buying advice, with that they should deliver.


Good thing they do then, eh? Very Happy

nellis wrote:
I only mention this to illustrate that games, like most things in life, are so often down to the reviewer's/gamer's taste.


*Cue applause*.

OctogenarianPussy wrote:
What does nine mean? Nine means fabulous, wonderful, enjoyable, great fun, well worth your money. Nine does not mean, unplayable, boring, unimaginitive, painful, broken, unfinished.


That’s just conflict of opinion.

GwiDan wrote:
He'd be a brave man to come back after yesterday, and the fact that their editorial team bowed to the might of commercialism instead of refusing with a bit of integrity showed they're not particularly brave at that Future office.


Nobody who has posted in this thread has yet to provide iron-cast evidence that any dodgy dealings have been going on at Future.
And as Miriam_NGC posted earlier in the thread, things have been sent back before - Future employees just don't whore gifts and shove on a good review score.
_________________
Currently humming: Mr Brightside. Quite ironic really...
tnman - GamesRadar's Big Brother Correspondant.
A.K.A The Dermot O' Leary of GR.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Wazza
Starting Member
Starting Member


Joined: 25 Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DRIV3R Rocks.... like it?.... buy it.... don't..... why do you even bother....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    gamesradar.com Forum Index -> General games chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 62, 63, 64  Next
Page 21 of 64
Watch this topic for replies
 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum


Forum powered by phpBB 2.0.8 Forum code © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Have a problem? For a quick response, please contact the appropriate magazine or web team by visiting their main site (links available on http://www.futurenet.com/)
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions